View Single Post
Old 2005-11-19, 02:45 PM   #67
RawAlex
Took the hint.
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,597
Send a message via AIM to RawAlex
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer
Just out of curiousity Alex, but where do you think that the majority of the content on the sites that you link to on this site http://www.findpics.net/ is shot? You don't seriously believe it's all shot in a studio in a commercial district somewhere do you? So, you are willing to profit from it, as long as it isn't produced in the house next door to yours, but it's okay if it's produced in the house next door to me?
Hammer, I am under not legal obligation to confirm the locations that content is shot. It could be in fact shot in a kindergarten classroom for that matter, it isn't important, now is it? I don't know, I don't care, and it doesn't make a difference. All I want to know is that there are model releases for the people and the models are all of legal ages, and that no children were present or witnessed it being made. The rest is the responsiblity of the people who produce it.

Nor is that an issue here.

I don't care that she does bondage. I don't care that she runs a website. I am concerned that she is running a commercial adult business in a residential neighborhood, and I am concerned that she is soliciting for sexual acts on her website, two things that reflect badly on the industry as a whole.

I also express concern that if she is fast and loose with the laws of zoning and solicitation, might she also not be just slightly loose with the rules for 2257 and model releases? When doubt is raised in one area, the rest should be looked at too.

The police didn't come to her house without a warrant, so they surely have something to work from. Is it valid? Will it stick? Will they use it to bootstrap up some other case against her? I don't know, and neither do you. We can only go by what we have in front of us.

Alex
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote