Quote:
|
Originally Posted by domweb
Interesting note I didn't see anyone else pick up on. The cops said it was illegal to practice Sadomasochism.
|
I don't think that one can say that sadomasochism is wholey illegal. It doesn't make sense, like much of what she said, so I believe many of us filtered it out.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by domweb
I have given donations at the door to get into fetish parties in the past and never had sex with anyone at the party.
|
The wife and I have paid entrance fees to get into a club and did have sex with others, but not the owners (creepy old couple) so I doubt that it could be considered prostition since none of us were paid. In the Empress' situation, I'm not sure if she stated what services she was performing for the "donations" so I couldn't say if she was prostituting herself. The club that I mentioned was in a residential neighborhood. Scummy, but residential none-the-less. Would I want it next to me? No. Does that make me hypocritical? Yes, but that's just how I roll.
From the outside, it didn't look any different from any other house on that block, but I wouldn't want to deal with the other things that sometimes follow explicit adult behavior.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by domweb
Did the phrase, "innocent until proven guilty" go out with civil rights after 9/11?
|
I'm penalizing your argument 5 points for that statement because you're grasping at straws. Bringing 9/11 into this discussion is almost as silly as telling the U.N. that Iraq blew up the towers.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by domweb
I am, however, fascinated how far some people will go to justify their arguments. In all my years I have never heard anyone introduce ZONING LAWS as a trump to free speech or free expression.
|
A lot of laws trump free expression. Zoning laws managed to get Cindy Sheehan arrested while attempting to deliver petitions to the White House the other day.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by domweb
As for the argument that "I don't want to be exposed to that and I don't want my kids exposed to it", makes me laugh my ass off. Anyone in the lifestyle goes OUT OF THEIR WAY to avoid exposing anyone to their play. And it's exactly because of the ignorance so blatantley expressed earlier.
|
I don't personally fear my kids being exposed - for the very reason you mentioned - discretion. But, shit happens and shit brings trouble to a community. It only takes one pissed off or jealous person creating waves and suddenly you have a lot of explaining to do.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by domweb
Webmaster, hooker, camgirl, whatever. Over ninety percent of porn is shot WITH HOOKERS as the performers.
|
That's simply not true.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by domweb
Maybe you are just mad because she might be cutting in on your online sales by going direct to the customer instead of being pimped by you?
|
Makes no sense what so ever.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by domweb
Porn Webmaster = Pimp
Accept it.
|
Not by any realistic definition. Pimps sell pussy. We sell pics of pussy.
I understand how you've become offended by this thread, I truly do. But I don't think anyone is attacking the S&M community. I can't imagine why anyone would. Sure, we've been stating that the person in question was acting pretty damned foolishly by advertising her services online, but that was pretty nuts. You and I, though from different sexual lifestyles, understand the need for discretion. She fucked up. She wasn't being discreet enough. If she had been discreet, this thread wouldn't be here right now.