Im gonna butt in here for a sec - and only because I tend to be a little more liberal on issues - I think that a good reference point for everyone that is not familiar with the history of what furrygirl is doing here -
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~n51ls801/period.html
is an excellent link to read and get some background.
I will not interject my personal feelings as they do not play in this whatsoever - I think that the whole discussion (no matter how much personal feelings have been jutted in) comes down to a battle between what some think that WMs have the right to publish and promote - vs - the effects of promoting those same ideas/fetishes/etc.
Unfortunately, the two are not opposing viewpoints although they are the talking points that have been taken in this thread.
I believe that both parties really do agree on the moral issue and the freedom of speech/publishing rights issues.
The finer point of the biz issue is really where the contention lies - and should be discussed - I think that both sides have the same outlook
personally on freedoms and their sanctity.
This then boils down to one side discussing the effect of "promoting a fetish and the repurcussions on the whole industry" and the other side basing the discussion as if there is no effect and these two basis of thought aren't opposing thoughts - they are completely different basis.