Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RawAlex
I don't think Joan is particularly well prepared to handle the rough and tumble world of chat boards and "instant opinion" that forms up on these boards. Her opinion on .xxx has waivered, and she has done that waivering in public, which is never good.
By definition, ASACP should have had NO opinion to start with on the subject (it doesn't affect them one iota). FSC should have had only one position ("it potentially limits free speech so it is bad"). That ASACP apparently had an opinion on .xxx made me wonder if the name change of the organization was also an indication of a grup becoming more political and less, well, useful (IMHO).
It's not a simple situation, but ASACP could have simply stayed out of it.
Alex
|
And miss out on that potential money?
Lens posted that he thought it was a good idea too. All the sheep at the Zoo were rapid to suck his dick over it too.
Funny though he left the room in San Diego when the topic came up and I wanted to ask him to explain to us all how .xxx was a good idea.
Wonder what Playboy thinks?