Afraid I am gonna have to take some issue with some of this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerDave
1. Google is not slow at indexing sites
|
It is if they are on a new domain. It is compared to MSN. Example four days ago I submitted a big site early on to get it indexed, if you
wanna know what I mean by big its
http://free-ads.kwikfire.com with a
couple of hundred pages. Within 48 hours MSN had fully indexed the
top 100 or so pages. Google as of yesterday had just about managed to crawl the index page. The last time I added a brand spanking new domain it took even longer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerDave
2. It's not punctuation
|
Normal punctuation does not seem to baffle google no. I think its because google was fed up by being spammed by the sort of folk
who put "samanthas hot pussy spoke to jeds cock who said that she should wash the hot pussy and take it for a ride to the cunt shop....." at the bottom of their pages as 'spoof content'. Now google seems to look at grammar and spelling judging by the re-rankings on some of mine and Olu's pages. I had a high ranking page which like the page under discussion here had an exclamation mark effectively in the middle of the description, the description vanished with the rank. After consulting a Guru I was told to remove the exclamation mark. Bang back where I was after a week or so. A smiley in the middle of a text passage and mis-spelling would not do any good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerDave
3. Your keywords should not be in first position EVERYwhere.. (unless your a SE spammer)
|
Did I say everywhere? I gave 5 specific places it
should be. I did not say "should be in an H1 heading, an H2 heading and in bold text at least three times on the page and in every alt tag, included in comments on the page and included in the names of any javascript routines ... oh and by the way every image on your page should be called big-busts-1, big-busts-2 and so on? Thats what the spammers do. I know what I have said to do here works and its probably as close to the line as you can get without penalties. If you are worried then put big-bust instead of big-busts in some of the places since it works the same (google habitually regards plurals as being the same keyword
when it comes to ranking but not analysis).
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerDave
4. Nobody KNOWS which bit of text Google will pick up. and that will depend on the keywords searched for.
|
Thats a pretty farcical statement. If you search google and see what is returned then look at the page source its fairly easy to predict for any given page that google will pick up:-
The description if it does not repeat keywords more than once, is grammatical (ie no absurd punctuation) and is not obviously a sales or marketing statement.
Failing that the first paragraph of body text which obeys the same rules as above but excluding any text in headings. If there are no paragraphs it can parse then you get.... nothing!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerDave
|
Yeah like... he already told us the page and site was indexed Dave.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerDave
You lack incoming links to the root index page
|
Incoming links to the root page will make bugger all difference to the display of text on it. Just the ranking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerDave
You lack content(text) of any sort on that page
|
Not true. There is a passage that reads
"Welcome

This is new site about big natural breasts and beautiful girls showing theirs talents... still in progress... so please sit and relax watching sexiest girls on net !"
If this was grammatical, did not contain any weird punctuation and was not obviously a sales pitch google would have picked it up as a description. Mind you I think the reference to being still under construction might get picked up as well. I dont KNOW this but suspect it ... if I have a site under construction I put the text telling the public in a gif image and call it something innocuous like "description.gif" so the SE's do not spot it. If its a big site and generally working then I dont bother!