OK so after reading two threads on this board I see some saying it's not a good idea, or unfeasible to label each page with the icra label, and I'm a little confused. Every page I have ever built, and will build in future has the icra label, and yes I mean every single adult page. As was said elsewhere there seems to be a quirk that you need only the necessary ingredients, you don't need to register every page. Once I went and generated the label for cfnmparty.co.uk which is:
Code:
<meta http-equiv="pics-label" content='(pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" comment "ICRAonline EN v2.0" l gen true for "http://www.cfnmparty.co.uk/" r (na 1 nb 1 nc 1 nd 1 ne 1 nf 1 nh 1 ni 1 vz 1 la 1 lb 1 lc 1 og 1 oh 1 cz 1) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://www.cfnmparty.co.uk/" r (n 4 s 4 v 0 l 4))'>
That caters for every page on the domain I put that code in (in the head section for those that don't know). New domain I swap the domain/tld accordingly, and use it on all pages on that domain, and so on for each domain. I'm guessing we pretty much all have our standard meta tags that we automatically put in for each page we build, so it's already there as soon as you start, no need to register anything, or even change anything within that line.
It may not be a perfect solution, but it does help, and I can say I feel much more comfortable using that than I feel uncomfortable using hardcore on a landing page. This does work for filters, at least it does for the guys that email me from their place of work asking how come they can't view my site(s) at work, so I'm guessing it blocks minors from seeing my sites whose parents have taken the steps to block them.
It's a seperate issue from adhering to the law, or proposed laws in the other threads here, which is why I started a new thread, but shouldn't we all be applying this on our pages? I feel it is more of a good faith effort than having a warning page with no hardcore to be honest.