as a side note: I should have used the word "mirror" instead of "doorway"....I guess Im just not that into the lingo yet
yep, understood half-deck
thanks for the fedback. The reason for this whole question was that it appeared that LL rules were....not forcing...but resutling in a freesite submitter to either:
a) reduce possible signups from 30-40 listings to 8-16, by building 1 freesite and submit to 8-16 LL's to avoid duplicative mirrors; or
b) forget any relevance they may build on the back of their freesites, and submit X versions of freesites for "cash now"
As a side note, I chose item A on the basis of a long term committment to this industry. I wont be dumping any of the old mirror sites that were submitted
Its just that I'll only be building a single site from now on.
Quote:
|
if all LL SEOed the crap out of their sites, you have a less chance of pulling SE traffic yourself with your free sites
|
You're probably right here - Im no SEO guru. However, Im not after pulling SE traffic with freesites...I dont know how much that actually happens, but I daresay its a very niche occurrence
But over time, keyworded free sites, on multiple domains, linking to a main LL will do good SE stuff eventually, if done right...right?
What Im looking at here....I have almost 150 freesites....I build approximately 6 freesites per week. I have 25 adult domains and will be buying more. Under my "old" approach of "freesite in triplicate", I think I was killing any SE relevance I may gotten due to massive duplicative content. Under this new approach, if I do the right things (thanks DD!), maybe I'll get somewhere for a niche or two within a couple of years.