Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bill
So far I can't say I've seen any big changes in the basic google results with bigdaddy. Most of what I have seen looks like "More of the same". More of a devalueing of the bottom two thirds of the web, more of an aristocracy of links ("trustrank", I suppose). A greater tendency to suppress results into supplemental.
|
Bill, what I find the most scary in this is that it appears to be Google regressing to the past, putting way too much emphasis on older and established sites with significant "natural" deep linking, and giving little space or time for new sites with new ideas or concepts.
It is the reason why an insider page at PBS for a special on porn that aired February 7, 2002 continuously ranks in the top 20, even though the page has not been updates and is losing relevance in reality every day.
it goes back to my basic issue with Google: They appear to be way more interested in developing new products not related to search, and they don't appear to give a damn about making the SERPs any better than they have been for the last couple of years.
Alex