View Single Post
Old 2006-05-30, 01:23 AM   #17
Ms Naughty
old enough to be Grandma Scrotum
 
Ms Naughty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,408
Send a message via ICQ to Ms Naughty
Tigermom, I could write you a long, detailed response to that post, but I've done it all before. That whole "assumptions" and "stereotypes" argument, been there, done that. Ask Furrygirl, she thinks she's the expert on that. LOL

Read my blog, I talk about this stuff a lot there. You can go on thinking that trying to build porn for women means only flowers and romance, but you'd be wrong. And if you don't like pussy licking... well, your loss, I guess.

As for language targeted to women:
Don't you feel just a little tiny bit left out by most mainstream porn sites because almost every word on them is talking to men, not to you?

Like when you're hot for seeing some great blowjob action and the words are saying: "Hey guys, you're going to shoot your wad over this!" Or "You'll love it when this hot chick sucks your dick!"?

Because you don't have a dick, do you? You don't blow loads, do you? You're a woman. Ideally, if you wanted to look at porn, any porn, it would acknowledge you as a viewer and validate your experience of sex.

THAT is what I'm talking about with language. It's about knowing that the audience for your porn is women, and talking to THEM, not assuming that every viewer has a dick.

Porn for women is still a new concept to a lot of people. One day there will be a whole bunch of categories of porn that caters to women. Give it time.

Tell me, have you ever made any sites yourself where the marketing language speaks to both sexes? Have you made any big cock or blowjob sites showing the kind of pics you yourself would enjoy?

If you think there's a problem with "for women" porn, I suggest you get in there and be the change you want to see.
__________________
Promote Bright Desire
Ms Naughty is offline   Reply With Quote