Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie
That's one that boggles my mind as well - I get sites titled "Slutty Blonde Milf" submitted to the mature category & "Slutty Mature Blonde" submitted to milf  |
Ditto...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponygirl
My main beef lately falls into #s 2 & 3, I think. I see this a lot with sites submitted to my 'Cum' category - 3 shots of goo out of 24 do not make it a cum site!
|
Ok, I'll respond to that because I am known for having built both cum & creampie sites -- though mine aren't your typical mom & pop variety. Here's the rub, with these types of sites
it's all about the ending.
Most generic cum sites will not have the cum-drooling and whatnot that I am privalidged enough to get my hands on, so what we see instead is an actual pop followed by like 12 pictures of a cum faced girl sitting there smiling which is actually pretty damn boring.
Creampies are even more difficult, because the whole payoff is the post coitus shot. I understand that generally more liberty is given here, but it's still an issue if you build a regular creampie site.
Here's my suggestion which I believe will get listed most anyplace. If you have two gallery pages, you should use two different sets of content.
In a creampie movie site I would say that if you have 4 movies, then one of them should be the cream exposing video even though it's only 25% of the page content.
On facial galleries, I would think you could get away with about 33% of the content on each page being a facial or 4 pics out of a set of 12.
Yes, it's more work to work with 2 seperate sets and it reduces your content folder potential to half of what it could be, but I think the action flows better this way without any "boring" shots and I don't know of a list that would decline you for this type of set up. IMO, liberty would be given to either of these types of sites if built correctly.