View Single Post
Old 2006-12-18, 03:52 PM   #9
DangerDave
Bonged
 
DangerDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BrisVegas, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,882
Quote:
the amount of nats bashing in here is amazing
Why is it that apologists always pull out the "<insert program name here> bashing" line everytime someone questions an action, process etc..

No one is bashing anyone... We have asked some legitimate questions, and as usual those that have the answers have treated us with contempt yet again.

DamnQ - what is your input in this? that you like NATS? Well "whoopee" for you - you could have said that in one line........



Yes.. NATS is coping some heat here and so they should... Legitimate questions have been asked and though they don't believe it(just yet) the opinions posted here do matter, and their product is being damaged.

but that said.... NATS/TMM isn't going to answer shit! because they know they don't have too While program owners continue to shell out the big bucks for their backend software.. which IN NO DOUBT assists the program owner in making more $$... they aint gonna say shit.... Which is why they ran away from this thread so fast..

DD

_______________________________
No Nats - Find programs that DON'T use NATS
Old Dollars - Selling older women via CCBill for longer than NATS has been around
DangerDave is offline   Reply With Quote