[NotThatKevin]

Paul if David Lace is selling content for eyesore bri then that is a civil case between eysore bri and David Lace. If the store owner (David Lace) refuses to pay his supplier (eyesore bri) then that is a civil case and the consumer (webmaster) cannot be held responsible for the stores (David Lace) actions.

What you are trying to say is that if I buy a pair of Levi's from JeansRUS and JeansRus refuse to pay Levi for that pair of jeans I am not allowed to wear them and must return them.

Furthermore you being a content provider places you in the same boat as Levi (the supplier) so what your saying is that all suppliers now need to refuse the consumer the rights to own what they legaly purchased at a store and return the items if the store owner hasn't paid his supplier? Hmm I don't think so mate