Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill
Say that some linklists aren't worth subbing to, and you get jumped on with both feet by all the linklist owners.
His list is a relevant list. It's real data, that reflects facts we all know about certain linklists. Okay, he's somewhat misinterpreted it, and he has sites that many of you would not list.
But he's got a point. And all of us freesite submitters, and many of you linklist owners, know he's got a point.
He's just dumb enough to say it out loud.
|
I see nothing wrong with sharing pertinent data. I doubt anyone is surprised that certain lists send more traffic than others. Using the term
black list is what creates the ire in this thread. That idiotic attempt at a smiley in the thread title doesn't help either.
I told him to add my sites to his moronic list for a couple of reasons. The thread's title is shite. His list is erroneous, being that it is based on his crap sites which one shouldn't expect to get listed. His example free sites are full of blind links - and I'm no blind link nazi. Also, I'm always the first to admit that I don't push buckets full of traffic. Really, I'm helping him by telling him to not bother submitting to me.
The wise and experienced free site submitter would create a list of seemingly inactive link lists and ask if everyone is seeing the same results without pre-judging the lists just in case every one except he/her is getting listed.