|
You really think filing a reinclusion request could help in a case like this?
I think it's more likely to cause harm than good.
And I don't see how it can cause a good result with an adult site, which is, as I've said, basically a commercial platform.
I tend to think you are applying a mainstream hope to the adult site arena, and that as soon as a google worker sees that reinclusion request for an adult site like ours, he's going to either ignore it completely, or assume that a reinclusion request wouldn't be filed unless there was something sneaky going on, and start looking for something to penalize the site for.
Do you have some reason to believe a reinclusion can help an adult site that hasn't previously been banned?
---
Having too many links with identical anchor text has been a known risk for two years or so now, it's one of the things we do have a bot of control over, and one of the things that can be worked on.
The phrase thing - which is basically the newest term for keyword stuffing - has probably been affecting adult sites for months now. It's not easy to create a large adult site without putting too many related phrases on any given page - that's the nature of describing porn that's for sale, and putting any more than a few links on any given page. You are going to end up with "too many" related phrases on the page.
|