A little follow up for those of you who may have read my email reply to Lace and thought, "wow, what a dick!"
My regular submitters know that I am an extremely lax and permissive reviewer. I don't spend much time scrutinizing links anymore. If it looks like something surfers would like and I can navigate it easily enough, I generally don't look for other issues. But if I've never heard of you, of course I'm going to take the time to see if you are pulling any shit. If your sites don't meet the generally accepted rules - they get rejected and
I tell you why. Hell, I still accept vid caps, I don't demand pics to be more than 600px on the long side, and I don't require more than 10 pics per gallery. I think I'm being pretty god damned reasonable. I don't come here saying, "I know I don't have dick for traffic, but I expect the same content as those who do."
So if I reply angrily to some unknown cunt who wants to debate a common sense rule, know that I do so because I care.
