Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaver Bob
it can be done with one person. do the pics first but the dude doesn't cum. then film the scene, then take pics of the cumshot afterwards. its better that way, you dont have someone snapping pics in the background while you are fliming. thats what we do anyways..
and teela, dont worry about your boobs. they dont need to be bigger, most of your members probably LIKE the fact that you have smaller breasts. The guys who are pulling out their credit cards to join your site are most likely that type of surfer.
|
I agree on both of Beaver Bob's points - but your guy needs to have a bit of control and be able to keep it up while shooting stills. When we can, we shot the intro on stills, then shoot it again on video. Then we shoot a few stills at every major position, scene change, or if I think we need a few.
As a photographer (and a bit of a pervert) as apposed to a videographer, (is that a word?) I do however love to see a stream of molten cum, in 12million pixel clarity, frozen halfway through it's journey towards a sexy sluts face. In practice, it seldom works so well, your shooting a scene and you want stills to match the video, the “Tom” is a bit shy (remember I shoot mostly amateur), somebody has to pick their kids up when school gets out, or I’m just tired of watching some under developed, insecure boyfriend trying to prove he’s a porn star. Give me two weeks, and I’ll have the boyfriend holding the camera while I fuck his girlfriend……
I do find that it takes about 1/10 the time to train someone to take decent video as it does to get someone to take decent pictures. But them I’m a picture snob – I admire a picture but I jerk off to the video….
If I'm ever in the area - I'll being my cameras...|goodidea
And DON’T FUCK WITH THE
! I make most of my money off the real tits, real woman crowd – You’re a real woman, a real fucking sexy woman, with real fucking nice tits - why fuck with them? On second thought, maybe fucking them ain’t all that bad……
