|
This is a good reasons, but they are subjective and you spend a relatively big time to catch them. Prime cost of the deep site checking is pretty high. Except grammar, there is no serious and visible differences.
Both sites loads fine from me and both of them is ugly (sorry Cleo).
One of the problem in LL industry: we can't surely separate good and bad FS.
What is a good FS?
How we measure creativenes and content originality?
Do we remember all content in our LL to prevent oversaturation?
Marc said, he like to accept good handmade sites and don't like autogenerated spammy sites. Do you really know, how much "good handmade" sites you accepting every day is a result of relatively good automated process?
|