Quote:
Originally Posted by kit
This is a good reasons, but they are subjective and you spend a relatively big time to catch them. Prime cost of the deep site checking is pretty high...
|
Do you really think I would spend as much time reviewing a site or going that in depth on a regular review? All reviewers should be looking at the site & if they come across a problem, reject the site then & there. There's no need to go any further into a site that has bad grammar. Click the reject button & move on to the next review.
The only reason I did an in-depth "review" of that site was to prove a point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kit
...Except grammar...
|
That is a pretty big problem - maybe not in your community, but it is in mine. That & the site not loading for some parts of the world are two very big reasons why that site is not listed.