Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainJSparrow
I wouldn't count on the DOJ to do anything about the tubes anytime this decade.
|
Well this decade is almost over, and their comments seem to indicate that they are eyeing the
social sites.
Plus, the likelyhood of getting convictions there are almost 100% compared to going after legit WMs.
Quote:
Therefore, the Department does not accept that such sites cannot operate under the proposed rule, or that such sites must maintain information concerning their users, much less that the Department must be able to inspect such data.
However, one who posts sexually explicit activity on "adult'' networking sites may well be a primary or secondary producer. Users of social networking sites may therefore be subject to the proposed rule, depending on their conduct.
That such users may certify without penalty or effective monitoring that they are over 18 is irrelevant to compliance with the proposed rule, since they may not in fact be above 18.
Moreover, depictions such users put on the sites may feature not only themselves but other people who have not even made the unverifiable certification required by a social networking site.
|