[tickler]

Idiots!

I'm still trying to digest their reasons, but I-D-I-O-T-S


"We are being asked to invalidate a law in its entirety based on a worst-case scenario that, to our knowledge, has never occurred, that may never come to pass and that has not been shown to involve a materially significant number of people," Circuit Judge Jeffrey Sutton wrote.
http://business.avn.com/articles/34501.html

The ruling(.pdf)
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions...9a0063p-06.pdf

I'm liking this guy who has a more detailed post.

This is a classic sexphobic move: sexually unconventional people, because they transgress certain normative sexual boundaries, are assumed to have no boundaries whatsoever.
http://polyperversity.blogspot.com/