So now they want to ban little boobs because
"Senator Joyce claimed that publications featuring small-breasted women were encouraging paedophilia." 
Also
"Female ejaculation" because it might be pee, but they also say it's fake so it can't be.
And "
not only are banned sites to be blocked – but also sites that link to banned sites are also in line for blocking." 
Quote:
The proposed Australian Government clampdown on smut just got a whole lot broader, as news emerged of a ban on small breasts and female ejaculation in adult material.
The end result of this widening of the censor’s net could be the addition of millions of websites to the internet filter now being proposed.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01...alian_censors/
|
Hmmm, the bigger the database the slower the processing. And they were worried about speed with only a few 1000s in the list.
Are they really going to ban Google, MSN, Yahoo, etc. |tomato|
Google search results
1230k Female ejaculation
1970k Female squirting
12500k small boobs/tits