|
Here's a question for everyone reading to ponder, not just Cleo.
If after someone admits he was wrong, apologizes and rectifies what he did -- and people still call him a "piece of shit" and ban him -- what is the incentive to do the right thing? The only incentive would be to follow his own conscience, which is ultimately what I did here. I have no regrets. But being this harsh to someone who is willing to own up to what he did is ultimately probably a poor life strategy.
By unbanned I meant that Cleo apparently no longer has a rule that she will not list sites that have my recip on them.
As to the "multiple nick submitter" thing, I have only ever used two nicknames for submitting, each of them associated with a different domain. I have not used them at the same time; I used one first then I stopped using it and adopted another. If there is some rule you are stuck with a nick for life I'd have been more careful to adopt one I really liked.
|