Greenguy's Board - View Single Post

Fuseblown · 2003-04-03, 02:21 PM

I agree with Keyser...just from WorldSex alone, on a very stripped down gallery, I used around 35gigs for about 120-140k *uniques*...there were many raws as well that went back to the gallery and looked at pictures again as well. Just to add a second opinion to that.

Not sure if you hand code your HTML or use a WYSIWYG editor like FP or Dreamweaver, but if you're looking to make complete efficient use of your bandwidth, hand coding is the way to go.

I ran some tests at one point where I could save 100-300MB just from using efficient coding structure just on one gallery that got posted to some of the large TGP's. It doesn't seem like much, but multiple that a couple hundred times, and, depending on how much you pay for bandwidth, it'll save you a little money. That's just a side thought..

:cool:

2003-04-03, 02:21 PM	#12
Fuseblown If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: State College, PA Posts: 32	I agree with Keyser...just from WorldSex alone, on a very stripped down gallery, I used around 35gigs for about 120-140k uniques...there were many raws as well that went back to the gallery and looked at pictures again as well. Just to add a second opinion to that. Not sure if you hand code your HTML or use a WYSIWYG editor like FP or Dreamweaver, but if you're looking to make complete efficient use of your bandwidth, hand coding is the way to go. I ran some tests at one point where I could save 100-300MB just from using efficient coding structure just on one gallery that got posted to some of the large TGP's. It doesn't seem like much, but multiple that a couple hundred times, and, depending on how much you pay for bandwidth, it'll save you a little money. That's just a side thought.. :cool: __________________ Fuseblown