Quote:
|
.. and where exactly is the evidence/proof for this statement??
|
Here are two searches on Google Images targetting image files named "perfectmilfs-[xxx].jpg." If Google did actually parse urls, it shouldn't have any problem finding the images when I run a search for "perfect" and "milfs."
Here's a search for "
perfectmilfs."
According to DangerDave, those images should also come up when I search for "
perfect" and "
milfs."
As TJ Pat also pointed out, Google made it clear their crawlers do not parse keywords in urls.
Quote:
|
As we have said here and in the SE forum MANY MANY MANY times.... be very careful who you take SE advice from and dont take what people say as 'gospel' or as 'fact', because most of the time they are just plain wrong.
|
One example is Matt Cutts recently stating Google slightly favors <strong> over <bold> then having another Google engineer show him the actual code where its clear both elements carry the same exact weight. Another is Jill Whalen claiming PR doesn't matter, then doing an about face after Big Daddy.
Draw your own conclusions. Don't believe someone just because he/she is supposeduly an authority on Google or because you feel like you're about to be run over by a truck.