Non Reciprocal Links

[Mattinblack]

Have started a new thing to do with SEO, URL is
http:// pnav dot kwikfire dot com / about dot html

Have a look and see what u think. Please be careful with how you reply cos these forums are watched by bots.... lol

[ecchi]

I cannot see how this helps with SEO because their spiders do not read links in java script. Also, as far as I can see, all the links go to your script so even if it were read it would not help member sites with their SE results. The only advantage I can see is as a common, or garden, variety ring. If I am misunderstanding what you are doing, can you explain more how this helps with SEO.

[Mattinblack]

I wish Se's did not read links in Jscript, I would cheat and put all my recips in them! Lol

Google reads links in document write commands in jscript I tested this some months ago when I was trying to hide some. It even picks them up in external Jscript files unless you go to extremes in order to hide them. But I digress since the answer to your question is not to be found there.

No the recip you get is on the hub page which if you look is in there at the bottom plus a second set of links at http://ukescort.servik.com/crawl-me.html which is indexed by most se's
search ukescort.servik.com at msn and it comes up - google has yet to find it due to 'sand box'.

So as I said you get two sets of recips per entry.

[LowryBigwood]

Originally Posted by Mattinblack

google has yet to find it due to 'sand box'.

The sand box theory is a myth. I have gotten in google in under 2 hours on one occassion and under 24 hours on another. However, I can't seem to replicate this everytime.

[Halfdeck]

Originally Posted by LowryBigwood

The sand box theory is a myth. I have gotten in google in under 2 hours on one occassion and under 24 hours on another. However, I can't seem to replicate this everytime.

The sandbox has less to do with Google refusing to include you in its index and more to do with your sites ranking high in the SERPS.

Google has confirmed that the sandbox effect exists; they have stated that the effect is unintentional but they "like what it's doing" and I doubt they have any intention of disabling it.

Whether your new site gets sandboxed or not depends on several factors; what factors exactly no one knows for sure except those coders up in Googleland.

[LowryBigwood]

Thanks for clearing that up Half Deck, I was under the impression the sand box theory had to do with getting indexed.

I stand corrected.

[Halfdeck]

"http://ukescort.servik.com/crawl-me.html"

The HyperText Markup Language (HTML), used to program pages on the web, allows two types ...

"www.garyfeng.com/blog/doc/001295.html"

Linking is the sine qua non of the Internet's most popular information access tool....

"www.garyfeng.com/blog/doc/001295.html"

"http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:IAabJ3BquZgJ:www.garyfeng.com/blog/doc/001295.html+%22Linking+is+the+sine+qua+non+of+the+Internet%27s+most+popular+information+access+tool%22&hl=en"

Mattinblack, I assume you're not "garyfeng"?

[Mattinblack]

No and neither am I any of these people! The original source for this text was an open forum posting on craigslist about three years ago - since then many people have lifted bits of the text or all of it in its entirity. Many claim it as their own, I have made no claims as to authorship.
The craigslist forums are quite good sources for non-copyright text on a multitude of subjects.

http://advertising.arrivenet.com/anchor_links.php
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/propert...mingnorms.html
http://www.bitlaw.com/internet/linking.html

+ maybe 400 other webpages with snippets of that original text on (including Mr Feng) the original author was a Lawyer from San Francisco called Dwight. He posted it trying to drum up some business for his firm.

[DJilla]

Originally Posted by Halfdeck

Linking is the sine qua non of the Internet's most popular information access tool....

STOP IT! It makes me shiver when yu talk dirty like that