|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
You can't keep blaming yourself. Just blame yourself once, and move on
|
Follow up to using sponsors...Do you promote CCBILL only sites or anything?
Is it more convenient for you to promote sites that use CCBILL (so that you can get paid in one check) or do you not care and promote all different sites that use other processors or their own?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
I have so many CCBill accounts it's not even funny. They asked me if I wanted to combine them last eyar & I asked if they had a breakdown on the check as far as the total from each & when they said no, I told them I'd pay the 33 cents for individual checks - makes my tracking & accounting a lot easier
![]() Also, why keep all your eggs in one basket? If you said that a year ago & replaced CCBill with GloBill, you'd be flipping burgers right now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
old enough to be Grandma Scrotum
|
Ah, 33cents a check... I can dream. I'm paying A$6, and that's the cheapest rate at present
![]() But self pitying moans aside LOL... Greenguy is right about the eggs in one basket. To be honest I think choosing sponsors based solely on their processor is not the best way to do business. You're better off making decisions based on a. How much you get paid b. Whether they convert c. Whether the site has a decent members area and can retain members d. If it caters to your niche In terms of just getting one check... if you're looking to cut costs there you just up the minimum payment amount.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Don't come to Florida for vacation. We're closed.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 1,874
|
General question:
Why is it that most sponsors are check based instead of Direct Deposit? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|