A shameful surrender to pornographers

[Tommy]

A loons view of the porn industry
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0402/p...op.html?page=1




Arlington, Va. - Another federal judge has struck down the Child Online Protection Act. Had it taken effect, the 1998 law would have done one simple thing: require Internet pornographers to verify the age of customers through the use of adult-access codes or credit cards.

Last month, Judge Lowell Reed Jr ruled out even this basic measure of accountability as a violation of the free-speech rights of porn purveyors and their often addicted customers.

Adding insult to injury, he said he was doing it for the kids: "Perhaps we do the minors of this country harm if First Amendment protections, which they will with age inherit fully, are chipped away in the name of their protection." So, by protecting the right of smut peddlers to exploit my daughter, Mr. Reed is actually protecting her right to exploit other children when she's an adult. The logic, and the arrogance, is breathtaking.

[Ms Naughty]

The author is obviously suffering brain damage as caused by hymnotoxins.
http://www.exexexchurch.com/hymnotoxins.html

[LowryBigwood]

Interesting read, thanks for the link.