So now that we have .xxx, what's your opinion...

xxxjay · 2011-04-20, 05:56 AM

I don't have one yet.

You?

Bill · 2011-04-20, 06:40 AM

I think that except for the domain name sellers, and certain people wanting to grab possibly new branding territory, it's not all that important.

Compared to the reduction in value of content, and the decline in sales, it's unlikely to harm anyone.

Cleo · 2011-04-20, 07:46 AM

Great domain suffix to sell moonshine on.

GigglesWorld · 2011-04-20, 02:38 PM

I think it's going to cost certain brands a lot of money.

TrainWreckContent · 2011-04-20, 05:30 PM

I still unsure what I think.

tickler · 2011-04-20, 07:12 PM

I think Pimproll might have a few issues with ICM wanting to keep porn.xxx for themselves!!!

Ramster · 2011-04-21, 09:05 AM

I think the entire XXX is a scam, total fucking scam. Look at tickler's post above about porn.xxx, case in point. We all know it's not really about keeping kids from porn and protecting against cp.

I also think (and hope) it'll die. Countries are banning it, states might ban it, universities and so on might ban it.

plateman · 2011-04-21, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramster

I think the entire XXX is a scam, total fucking scam. Look at tickler's post above about porn.xxx, case in point. We all know it's not really about keeping kids from porn and protecting against cp.

I also think (and hope) it'll die. Countries are banning it, states might ban it, universities and so on might ban it.

I agree a scam to get more money out of adult, how far this gets, is up to the people who have the most money

Toby · 2011-04-21, 01:49 PM

How long will it be before ICM and/or IFFOR are lobbying congress to make .xxx mandatory, all in the name of "protecting the children". Of course, ICM will be making millions in the process.

Joan Irvine recently resigned as director of ASACP to become executive director of IFFOR. IFFOR is headquartered in Washington, DC. There's your obvious connection to CP and lobbying congress.

$10 from each .xxx purchased goes to IFFOR. Anyone buying a .xxx is funding their own eventual extinction.

Jeremy82 · 2011-04-21, 05:01 PM

This all about .xxx is unprecedented thievery and scam. Guys in the government should take care to get people to work instead of waste market for profit for favored groups.

CaptainJSparrow · 2011-04-25, 02:04 PM

Bad for folks that have old established sites. Depending on where the politicians and media go with it, it could be an opportunity. Probably just a fart in the wind, though.

2011-04-20, 05:56 AM	#1
xxxjay You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: atlanta Posts: 1,787	So now that we have .xxx, what's your opinion... I don't have one yet. You? __________________ Circle Of Violence

2011-04-20, 07:46 AM	#3
Cleo Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Southeast Florida Posts: 27,936	Great domain suffix to sell moonshine on. __________________ Free Rides on Uber and Lyft Uber Car: uberTzTerri Lyft Car: TZ896289

2011-04-20, 02:38 PM	#4
GigglesWorld If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 244	I think it's going to cost certain brands a lot of money. __________________ Vibrators from Giggles \| PDX Fuck Me Silly from Giggles \| Sex Toy Reviews

2011-04-20, 05:30 PM	#5
TrainWreckContent Ahhh ... sweet pity. Where would my love life be without it? Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 200	I still unsure what I think. __________________ http://www.trainwreckcontent.com/cart/index.php & http://adultcontentsource.com

2011-04-20, 07:12 PM	#6
tickler If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste! Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,177	I think Pimproll might have a few issues with ICM wanting to keep porn.xxx for themselves!!! __________________ Latina Twins, Solo, NN, Hardcore Latin Teen Cash

2011-04-20, 06:40 AM	#2
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	I think that except for the domain name sellers, and certain people wanting to grab possibly new branding territory, it's not all that important. Compared to the reduction in value of content, and the decline in sales, it's unlikely to harm anyone.

2011-04-21, 09:05 AM	#7
Ramster Life is good Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ottawa, Canada Posts: 11,705	I think the entire XXX is a scam, total fucking scam. Look at tickler's post above about porn.xxx, case in point. We all know it's not really about keeping kids from porn and protecting against cp. I also think (and hope) it'll die. Countries are banning it, states might ban it, universities and so on might ban it. __________________ Pornstar Legends \| Live Cam Model Shows \| Hungarian Girls Skype: robmurray999

2011-04-21, 01:49 PM	#9
Toby Lonewolf Internet Sales Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Houston Posts: 4,826	How long will it be before ICM and/or IFFOR are lobbying congress to make .xxx mandatory, all in the name of "protecting the children". Of course, ICM will be making millions in the process. Joan Irvine recently resigned as director of ASACP to become executive director of IFFOR. IFFOR is headquartered in Washington, DC. There's your obvious connection to CP and lobbying congress. $10 from each .xxx purchased goes to IFFOR. Anyone buying a .xxx is funding their own eventual extinction. __________________ Latex Vixens Babes In Boots Well Heeled Women Dressing For Sex Stocking Vixens

2011-04-21, 05:01 PM	#10
Jeremy82 You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 988	This all about .xxx is unprecedented thievery and scam. Guys in the government should take care to get people to work instead of waste market for profit for favored groups. __________________ FeetSexVids.com

2011-04-25, 02:04 PM	#11
CaptainJSparrow You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Louisiana Posts: 511	Bad for folks that have old established sites. Depending on where the politicians and media go with it, it could be an opportunity. Probably just a fart in the wind, though.