Question regarding voyeur content

msanchez · 2005-03-09, 12:31 PM

Hi everybody,

was thinking of expanding my horizons today and making a site in the voyeur niche.

As I have started to do this I notice that alot of the voyeur content available looks pretty much like crap in my opinion.

But maybe thats the thing with voyuer as its not set in a studio with pro photographers and such.

But before I got and submit a site I just wanted to check here first and see what input you all have regarding the quality of voyuer content and getting listed.

Thanks and cheers

Greenguy · 2005-03-09, 01:15 PM

If I see content that I think a surfer would think was staged (camera moves, girl looks at the camera, an obvious content set/location) then I decline it.

msanchez · 2005-03-09, 01:43 PM

OK thanks GG

So it looking kinda crappy is a part of it then.

Well I send you the site for today of course and we will see how it goes.

Verbal · 2005-03-09, 02:45 PM

Hi msanchez,
I think the non-pro feel really makes the pics more believable. This is the one niche where I'd accept somewhat below-average content (within certain limits, lol). Send me some sites too if you'd like since we don't get many voyeur submits these days.

msanchez · 2005-03-09, 03:50 PM

Hi verbal, Ill take a look at your rules and see if I comply and if I do Ill send a site over today.

Thanks and Cheers

Cleo · 2005-03-09, 03:56 PM

Just as my rules for pics of webcam girls or different then my other niches my unofficial rules for voyeur sites are different. Grainy not so great pics or ok for voyeur as long as they are believable voyeur pics.

dareutwo · 2005-03-09, 04:11 PM

Ummmm all of the above...
There are some good voyeur pics out there, I think there is 8 of them

Grainy, small, those rules are relaxed a lot.

Greenguy · 2005-03-09, 04:41 PM

Yeah - I wouldn't go as far as saying "crappy" pics are acceptable, but I think you get the gist of it

msanchez · 2005-03-09, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Yeah - I wouldn't go as far as saying "crappy" pics are acceptable, but I think you get the gist of it

Heh maybe crappy wasnt the right term

but I hear what you all are saying. Thanks for the advice.

msanchez · 2005-03-09, 05:15 PM

GG thats still no vid caps right?

Greenguy · 2005-03-09, 06:54 PM

Correct.

RawAlex · 2005-03-09, 07:16 PM

Sometimes voyeur pictures are partially obscured, not centered, etc... basically NOT pro looking pics, but rather pics that look like you would see if someone hid a camera on a shelf or something. Security cams, long telephotos to couples making out, things like that...

I am NOT as fussy about voyeur as I am about others, but I don't like "pro voyeur" stuff, it's dull.

Alex

plateman · 2005-03-09, 08:30 PM

yeap you gotta be a true voyeur that would look through a dirty keyhole and get a look at a naked chick or a small crack and have pictures like that..

2005-03-09, 12:31 PM	#1
msanchez It is better to watch things then to do them Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: The Thumb Posts: 484	Question regarding voyeur content Hi everybody, was thinking of expanding my horizons today and making a site in the voyeur niche. As I have started to do this I notice that alot of the voyeur content available looks pretty much like crap in my opinion. But maybe thats the thing with voyuer as its not set in a studio with pro photographers and such. But before I got and submit a site I just wanted to check here first and see what input you all have regarding the quality of voyuer content and getting listed. Thanks and cheers __________________ I buy text links, clicked traffic, blog posts, and more! Hit me with a pm.

2005-03-09, 01:15 PM	#2
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,929	If I see content that I think a surfer would think was staged (camera moves, girl looks at the camera, an obvious content set/location) then I decline it. __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network

2005-03-09, 01:43 PM	#3
msanchez It is better to watch things then to do them Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: The Thumb Posts: 484	OK thanks GG So it looking kinda crappy is a part of it then. Well I send you the site for today of course and we will see how it goes. __________________ I buy text links, clicked traffic, blog posts, and more! Hit me with a pm.

2005-03-09, 02:45 PM	#4
Verbal Verbal prefers 56K Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 563	Hi msanchez, I think the non-pro feel really makes the pics more believable. This is the one niche where I'd accept somewhat below-average content (within certain limits, lol). Send me some sites too if you'd like since we don't get many voyeur submits these days. __________________ Verbal

2005-03-09, 03:50 PM	#5
msanchez It is better to watch things then to do them Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: The Thumb Posts: 484	Hi verbal, Ill take a look at your rules and see if I comply and if I do Ill send a site over today. Thanks and Cheers __________________ I buy text links, clicked traffic, blog posts, and more! Hit me with a pm.

2005-03-09, 03:56 PM	#6
Cleo Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Southeast Florida Posts: 27,936	Just as my rules for pics of webcam girls or different then my other niches my unofficial rules for voyeur sites are different. Grainy not so great pics or ok for voyeur as long as they are believable voyeur pics. __________________ Free Rides on Uber and Lyft Uber Car: uberTzTerri Lyft Car: TZ896289

2005-03-09, 04:11 PM	#7
dareutwo You can't disprove anything with evidence that doesn't exist Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: NW Minnesota - pop 865 +/- 1 Posts: 2,038	Ummmm all of the above... There are some good voyeur pics out there, I think there is 8 of them Grainy, small, those rules are relaxed a lot. __________________ This is me Mark's-Links

2005-03-09, 04:41 PM	#8
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,929	Yeah - I wouldn't go as far as saying "crappy" pics are acceptable, but I think you get the gist of it __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network

2005-03-09, 05:15 PM	#10
msanchez It is better to watch things then to do them Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: The Thumb Posts: 484	GG thats still no vid caps right? __________________ I buy text links, clicked traffic, blog posts, and more! Hit me with a pm.

2005-03-09, 06:54 PM	#11
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,929	Correct. __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network

2005-03-09, 07:16 PM	#12
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	Sometimes voyeur pictures are partially obscured, not centered, etc... basically NOT pro looking pics, but rather pics that look like you would see if someone hid a camera on a shelf or something. Security cams, long telephotos to couples making out, things like that... I am NOT as fussy about voyeur as I am about others, but I don't like "pro voyeur" stuff, it's dull. Alex

2005-03-09, 08:30 PM	#13
plateman What can I do - I was born this way LOL Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: ohio Posts: 3,086	yeap you gotta be a true voyeur that would look through a dirty keyhole and get a look at a naked chick or a small crack and have pictures like that.. __________________ Submit to: Porn O Plenty XXX Links Reality Here