Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2005-06-03, 09:00 PM   #1
pornrex
feeling a bit better
 
pornrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,779
First 2257 Offender goes to prison...

This guy fucked up - BIG TIME

http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=9002
pornrex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-03, 09:08 PM   #2
Cleo
Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West
 
Cleo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southeast Florida
Posts: 27,936
Quote:
Martell's photographs, featuring five girls between the ages of 13-17, were first reported by a film processing company, which filed a report with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in January 2004.
This goes well beyond just not having the proper paperwork.
__________________
Free Rides on Uber and Lyft
Uber Car: uberTzTerri
Lyft Car: TZ896289
Cleo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-03, 09:24 PM   #3
sue-fl
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
sue-fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,837
Send a message via ICQ to sue-fl
Umm sorry but he deserved to go to prison. 13-17 year olds is just sick..
sue-fl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 05:46 AM   #4
Soul/Rebel
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleo
This goes well beyond just not having the proper paperwork.

true and he got only 3 years? Now that's fucked up
Soul/Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-03, 09:26 PM   #5
Greenguy
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
 
Greenguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo)
Posts: 41,920
Send a message via ICQ to Greenguy
Yeah, but if you throw "2257" into the title of the article, well.....

|skyfall|
__________________

Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network
Greenguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 12:18 AM   #6
Useless
Certified Nice Person
 
Useless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dirty Undies, NY
Posts: 11,268
Send a message via ICQ to Useless
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenguy
Yeah, but if you throw "2257" into the title of the article, well.....

|skyfall|
Just more fear mongering from our pals at XBiz. He was prosecuted for taking nude pics of underage models. The 2257 was thrown in just to add more charges, the same way they add on a no seat belt charge when you kill someone while driving drunk. I hope people who read this thread realize that it has NOTHING to do with the updated version of 2257 and that no one simply knocked on his door one day, completely unsolicited, and asked for his fucking records. He's a 78 year old aspiring pervert, not an adult webmaster.

Next.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.
Useless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-03, 09:28 PM   #7
Greenguy
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
 
Greenguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo)
Posts: 41,920
Send a message via ICQ to Greenguy
...and let's get another thing clear - this is NOT the 1st "2257 offender" Any fucktard that's gone to prison for taking CP pics in the past came before this assclown.
__________________

Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network
Greenguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-03, 10:38 PM   #8
quest
Trying is the first step towards failure
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Motor City, MI.
Posts: 122
Send a message via ICQ to quest
I can't even understand how he was sentenced under 2257, it's cp...


Though it would show Current 2257 laws work As They Are...



Ben
quest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-03, 11:50 PM   #9
Agent
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by quest
I can't even understand how he was sentenced under 2257, it's cp...


Though it would show Current 2257 laws work As They Are...



Ben
2257 aka "Traci Lord's law". She was underage when she made her flicks.
__________________
Brihana.com
Agent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 08:47 AM   #10
SirMoby
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
 
SirMoby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADK
2257 aka "Traci Lord's law". She was underage when she made her flicks.
Traci Lords had valid government issued IDs. The new regs would not have stopped her from legally appearing in those flicks
SirMoby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 10:14 AM   #11
Ramster
Life is good
 
Ramster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 11,805
Send a message via ICQ to Ramster Send a message via AIM to Ramster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADK
2257 aka "Traci Lord's law". She was underage when she made her flicks.
So did Alexandria Quinn didn't she?

This idiot really has nothing to do with the NEW 2257 law that may effect all of us.
__________________
Pornstar Legends | Live Cam Model Shows | Hungarian Girls
Skype: robmurray999
Ramster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 12:18 PM   #12
amadman
I've been mad for fucking years, absolutely years, been over the edge for yonks....
 
amadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: padded room
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by quest
Though it would show Current 2257 laws work As They Are...
Only because this dude actually took the pictures.
What about people that are making cp sites but did not take the pictures?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Torn
.... child porn is not 2257.....
But 2257 is to aid in preventing/prosecuting cp.
Granted the new changes open the doors a bit wide for comfort. |shocking|

I think the 2257 hype is just xbiz's slant.
here is another artical on this story:
http://www.uticaod.com/archive/2005/...ews/29758.html
It mentions id's and records being required but does not say '2257' specificly.
amadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 12:08 AM   #13
amadman
I've been mad for fucking years, absolutely years, been over the edge for yonks....
 
amadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: padded room
Posts: 861
Good! This is what 2257 is supposed to be about. Lets just hope they only use it for such cases.
amadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 01:25 AM   #14
Torn Rose
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." ~ Mark Twain
 
Torn Rose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 4,806
nothing to add that wasn't said already.... child porn is not 2257.....
Torn Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 03:50 AM   #15
Mr. Blue
Searching for Jimmy Hoffa
 
Mr. Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 771
It's fucking jackasses that do that kinda shit that makes it bad for the rest of us.
Mr. Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 04:25 AM   #16
Fido
And Lord, we are especially thankful for nuclear power, the cleanest, safest
energy source there is. Except for solar, which is just a pipe dream
 
Fido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 229
Send a message via ICQ to Fido
Most countries do not need 2257 to get such a people to the jail.
Fido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 04:37 AM   #17
Boogie
I like to blog :)
 
Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,050
Ok one thing some folks are missing is this.

Throw aside the fact that he was a CP'er which pretty much stands to reason he is a fuckwit.

Aside from CP laws, they also struck him with 2257 violations. This is important because it shows that the law, as it stood BEFORE JUNE 23rd as applicable to printed pictures was enforcable and prosecutable.

that means get your shit in order if you're making CP so they have one less thing to throw the books at you. OF COURSE IF XBIZ IS FUCKING RUNNING THIS ARTICLE TO WARN ITS CP'ERS TO GET DOCUMENTATION THAT IS LUDICROUS.

Otherwise it only has one relevence. If you're producing and PRINT PUBLISHING adult material, 2257 is damned applicable. Especially if you're shooting CP :p
__________________
I got a porn blog!
Got a blog worth linking to? Contact me
Boogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 06:26 AM   #18
GunnCat
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 547
Send a message via ICQ to GunnCat
They threw 2257 into this so when the government starts going after webmasters, they can say they have already prosecuted 1 child pornographer under the new 2257 regulations.
GunnCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 09:46 AM   #19
Useless
Certified Nice Person
 
Useless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dirty Undies, NY
Posts: 11,268
Send a message via ICQ to Useless
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnCat
... they can say they have already prosecuted 1 child pornographer under the new 2257 regulations.
No, they can say they prosecuted someone under the old 2257 regs. The updated version isn't in use yet. We still have a couple of weeks.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.
Useless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 12:17 PM   #20
GunnCat
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 547
Send a message via ICQ to GunnCat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
No, they can say they prosecuted someone under the old 2257 regs. The updated version isn't in use yet. We still have a couple of weeks.
I understand UW, but to John Q. Public that distinction will likely be lossed.
GunnCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 10:45 AM   #21
spiceman45
Internet! Is that thing still around?
 
spiceman45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rustbelt Wisconsin
Posts: 4
Send a message via ICQ to spiceman45
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnCat
They threw 2257 into this so when the government starts going after webmasters, they can say they have already prosecuted 1 child pornographer under the new 2257 regulations.
How right you are. This guy was hanging fruit easy to nab and will be used as an example even though it is 2256 that he falls under.

Btw this asswipe need to be in jail.
spiceman45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 06:50 AM   #22
grzepa
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 980
I'd say he went to prison for CP not for unproper 2257 paperwork...
grzepa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 08:12 AM   #23
Mishi
I want to live. I want to experience the universe, and I want to eat pie.
 
Mishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plain
Posts: 661
Send a message via ICQ to Mishi
I am ashamed of XBiz for hyping this as a 2257 violation. The article suggests a 2257 violation was involved (duh) but doesn't make it clear if that was the basis of the convition...I suspect NOT, what with the whole underage thing. It's not as if this jerk would have got off if he'd had records.

I am very unhappy with the state of our industry right now. I've been so proud when we've rallied around any one person who needed help - but when the entire industry is ailing, we fall apart.
Mishi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 11:44 AM   #24
MadMax
"Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes" ~ Satan
 
MadMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Motor City, baby, where carjacking was invented! Now GIMME THOSE SHOES!
Posts: 2,385
Personal Opinion: The DOJ is desperate to be able to show congress that they're enforcing 2257, so they chose to prosecute this fuckwit under 2257 instead of a pile of other federal laws they could have prosecuted him for violating. Don't forget that prosecutors have an unbelievable amount of leeway in regards to what charges they actually file. Had they not prosecuted him for violating 2257, he would have been convicted as just another CPer and they wouldn't have gotten nearly as much free press.
MadMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-04, 12:44 PM   #25
Tommy
NYC Boy That Moved To The Island
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,940
Send a message via ICQ to Tommy
am I the only person who thinks these new 2257 laws arent that bad

The adult industry needed something like this

look at the paperwork the medical industry has to keep or the banking industry
__________________
Accepting New partners
Tommy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc