 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-09-28, 09:16 AM
|
#1 |
|
on vacation
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,095
 |
Cleo...
Hi Cleo,
My site got rejected due to "bad video grabs"?? Do you mean the pics are poor quality? Granted, they aren't professional quality, but this is an amateur site & the pics are stills. I didn't think they were that bad compared to some I've seen out there. Any feedback would be good Thanks lots, Ponygirl http://www.liquisexxx.com/toysites/t...der/index.html |
|
|
|
2004-09-28, 09:28 AM
|
#2 |
|
Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southeast Florida
Posts: 27,936
|
Those aren't pics they are grabs from videos.
 |
|
|
|
|
2004-09-28, 09:49 AM
|
#3 |
|
on vacation
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,095
|
well they were taken with a digital video camera set on dsc still mode -so each pic is taken separately to a memory card & then downloaded to pc. There was no artificial lighting used, & I can see where they are a bit pixilated, so this is probably why they look like video grabs??
I guess a better camera is in order! Thanks, Ponygirl |
|
|
|
|
2004-09-28, 09:59 AM
|
#4 |
|
Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southeast Florida
Posts: 27,936
|
The scan lines going through the pics resulting in jagged lines along the edges is why I decline content like this. IMO it is just as bad as over compressing the pics.
You can get a digital camera that will take decent pics really cheap these days so no reason to try to use a video camera to make stills. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
