Bloody Google! PR3 on my 2257-page

GeorgeTH · 2005-01-09, 04:52 PM

... despite it having from day one a <META name="ROBOTS" content="NOINDEX"> in its header!

...when you're keen to get a decent PR you have to be patient and wait for months, when you don't want your page indexed at all the bloody spider thinks "oh, this was easy to read, and so many familiar names on it = it must be good. Give it a PR3."

Porn Meister · 2005-01-09, 07:13 PM

Maybe it has PR but is not indexed, lol

AdultCEO · 2005-01-09, 08:36 PM

GeorgeTH,

I can't see where is the bad thing with PR3.

Why not have some links in your 2257 pointing to your more important pages with a proper anchor text...

In this way you icrease your link popularity AND

Even if surfers find your site through your 2257 show them where you want them to go.... |rasta|

George

cow · 2005-01-13, 08:16 AM

What Porn Meister says could be true.

You could check this in Google if you search on a specific word which is present on your 2257 page and do an advanced search on pages within your domain.

This can be done via:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en

Moo

GeorgeTH · 2005-01-13, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cow
What Porn Meister says could be true.

You could check this in Google if you search on a specific word which is present on your 2257 page and do an advanced search on pages within your domain.

o.k. - it looks like it's not indexed but only has a PR...

urb · 2005-01-15, 12:53 PM

Don't forget to get some outgoing links on that.
Coz you didn't specify "no follow".

natalie · 2005-02-14, 04:36 PM

Great news! All of the search engines have agreed on a new anchor attribute:
<a rel="nofollow"> George you could use that on the 2257 links to stop this.

Greenguy · 2005-02-14, 06:19 PM

I could be mistaken, but I think that Google will base your inside pages off the PR on the root - sorta like a guess.

Linkster · 2005-02-15, 11:43 AM

GG - thats very true - subdirectories still get PR transfer based on the root and any other pages linking to it - it used to be that you could pretty much figure that if the root was PR4 then the first subdirectory would be PR3 and the second would be PR2 - etc.

Still works that way as far as I can tell

Joe · 2005-03-07, 09:05 PM

If you're really worried, just add the directory to your robots.txt file.

punaniman · 2005-03-09, 06:22 PM

my girl nat is correct.
your 2557 link will dilute the pr to the rest of your site. By putting in the <a rel="nofollow"> attribute you will increase the strength of the pr transferring to other pages in your site. IMO this is much better than putting links on the 2557 page.

Linkster · 2005-03-09, 07:47 PM

You could use that tag - but from what Im hearing from insiders - it might not be the best thing to do

Joe · 2005-03-09, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

You could use that tag - but from what Im hearing from insiders - it might not be the best thing to do

I was wondering the same thing. Now that the nofollow tag is fully adapted, it is obvious that it is going to be open to abuse.

What've you heard from your side, Linkster?

punaniman · 2005-03-09, 08:19 PM

Linkster, I have heard the same thing. People seem to be concerned that it will be too easy to tell that a site is SEO'd by using that attribute, thus google will penalise the sites using it. I have not seen any real reasons other than this and the usual google paranoia.

I dont image that it would get penalised as google are the ones that initiated its use. Plus it is a great tool to stop forum and blog spam and thus is in the SE's best interest use it. Thus I can't see them having a problem with it.

2005-01-09, 04:52 PM	#1
GeorgeTH Don't let a programmer design your front-end pages! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: currently on the road in CA Posts: 781	Bloody Google! PR3 on my 2257-page ... despite it having from day one a <META name="ROBOTS" content="NOINDEX"> in its header! ...when you're keen to get a decent PR you have to be patient and wait for months, when you don't want your page indexed at all the bloody spider thinks "oh, this was easy to read, and so many familiar names on it = it must be good. Give it a PR3." __________________ Have a nice day!

2005-01-09, 08:36 PM	#3
AdultCEO Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Europe Posts: 24	GeorgeTH, I can't see where is the bad thing with PR3. Why not have some links in your 2257 pointing to your more important pages with a proper anchor text... In this way you icrease your link popularity AND Even if surfers find your site through your 2257 show them where you want them to go.... \|rasta\| George __________________ <a href="http://stats.ars4real.com/wmref/click.php?type=but&a=1027394" target="_blank"> <img border="0" src="http://stats.ars4real.com/wmref/load.php?type=but&a=1027394"></a>

2005-01-13, 08:16 AM	#4
cow Heh Heh Heh! Lisa! Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 70	Hi GeorgeTH What Porn Meister says could be true. You could check this in Google if you search on a specific word which is present on your 2257 page and do an advanced search on pages within your domain. This can be done via: http://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en Moo __________________ <a href="http://www.blinkingcow.com" target="_blank">BlinkingCOW . COM</a> <a href="http://**cash.com/?_sexnu" target="_blank">** Cash - great conversions, even with shitty traffic</a>

2005-01-15, 12:53 PM	#6
urb All the way from Room 101 Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 3,557	Don't forget to get some outgoing links on that. Coz you didn't specify "no follow". __________________

2005-02-14, 04:36 PM	#7
natalie Whoo! 9/10 the way to buddy plays in "The Christ from Oz"! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 921	Great news! All of the search engines have agreed on a new anchor attribute: <a rel="nofollow"> George you could use that on the 2257 links to stop this. __________________ No 2257 woes with Retroraunch Submit to my Punani And my Pink Pussy

2005-01-09, 07:13 PM	#2
Porn Meister Asleep at the switch? I wasn't asleep, I was drunk Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 214	Maybe it has PR but is not indexed, lol

2005-02-14, 06:19 PM	#8
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,929	I could be mistaken, but I think that Google will base your inside pages off the PR on the root - sorta like a guess. __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network

2005-02-15, 11:43 AM	#9
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	GG - thats very true - subdirectories still get PR transfer based on the root and any other pages linking to it - it used to be that you could pretty much figure that if the root was PR4 then the first subdirectory would be PR3 and the second would be PR2 - etc. Still works that way as far as I can tell __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-03-07, 09:05 PM	#10
Joe The information superhighway showed the average person what some nerd thinks about Star Trek Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: California Posts: 337	If you're really worried, just add the directory to your robots.txt file.

2005-03-09, 06:22 PM	#11
punaniman Internet! Is that thing still around? Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 6	my girl nat is correct. your 2557 link will dilute the pr to the rest of your site. By putting in the <a rel="nofollow"> attribute you will increase the strength of the pr transferring to other pages in your site. IMO this is much better than putting links on the 2557 page. __________________ <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="http://www.pun-an-i.com/links/suggest.php?action=addlink"> Submit to Nats Punani</a> <a href="http://www.forpinkpussy.com/suggest.php?action=addlink"> And her Pink Pussy</a> </font>

2005-03-09, 07:47 PM	#12
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	You could use that tag - but from what Im hearing from insiders - it might not be the best thing to do __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-03-09, 08:19 PM	#14
punaniman Internet! Is that thing still around? Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 6	Linkster, I have heard the same thing. People seem to be concerned that it will be too easy to tell that a site is SEO'd by using that attribute, thus google will penalise the sites using it. I have not seen any real reasons other than this and the usual google paranoia. I dont image that it would get penalised as google are the ones that initiated its use. Plus it is a great tool to stop forum and blog spam and thus is in the SE's best interest use it. Thus I can't see them having a problem with it. __________________ <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="http://www.pun-an-i.com/links/suggest.php?action=addlink"> Submit to Nats Punani</a> <a href="http://www.forpinkpussy.com/suggest.php?action=addlink"> And her Pink Pussy</a> </font>