Rule. Pics file size under 100kb.

AWMJ · 2006-08-24, 06:11 AM

In our days when th******** high speed internet connection is a regular thing and the bandwidth is pretty cheap.
Why such rule still exist?

Hey Netpond be so kind remove this rule.

Jeka · 2006-08-24, 07:20 AM

Eventhough I don't like that rule neither I can see some reasons for that rule.
- There are still people using slow connections and it would take too long for them to load big images (I wonder why they should ever join a site then as the images in the member areas are a lot bigger)
- By limiting the file size to 80kb they make sure that nobody gives away the original pictures (3000x2000 px) etc. which increases signup changes

Jeremy · 2006-08-24, 08:18 AM

Jeka: That's about the long and the short of it. Not everyone has super-quick, high-speed broadband. Oddly, they'll wait if they're paying for it, but not if it's free.

AWMJ: Learn how to use a thumbnailing program and increase your selling opportunities to every surfer.

AWMJ · 2006-08-24, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeremy

AWMJ: Learn how to use a thumbnailing program and increase your selling opportunities to every surfer.

Who said that I don't know how to use thumbnailing programs?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

I was a cunt hair nervous when the original post made it sound like the pics had to be 1200px on the long side (phew), but otherwise - I'm not seeing a problem here. You shouldn't be pushing the lower size pics anyway. He or she with the better samples is going to sell more porn. Keep shoving those 500px wide pixelated pieces of shit in front of your surfers and wonder why they're not buying. Good samples will sell the site better than constantly repeating "I know my samples suck, but if you join you'll get nicer shots.

I am not trying to tell you that 500 Kb for pics are ok. I am trying to tell you that 100 Kb rule for pics are uncommon in our days.
Personally for me 150 Kb pictures are more that enough, they have good quality and dimension.

And why I should try to sell 80 Kb pictures to someone when he will get in members area pics more than 80K?

Useless · 2006-08-24, 10:03 AM

Thanks for pulling me into a thread that I had zero intention of entering. This shit gets discussed over and over and over (and over) again. Optimize your fucking pics. This is a no whine zone.

My quote post above was referring to pic size, not weight. You can produce larger pics with relatively low weight while maintaining visual clarity with simple optimization.

Jeremy · 2006-08-24, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

You can produce larger pics with relatively low weight while maintaining visual clarity with simple optimization.

Careful UW. More comments like that and people will think you should be called Useful ;-))

WarBot · 2006-08-24, 08:15 PM

I havent had any problems keeping the pics around 80kb at 700-740 on the long side yet. But I know I have a few sets where I probably will. Mostly the outdoor stuff, the dark background with alot of colors stuff, and a few others. The new 1200 rule and the old 80kb rule did force me to figure out that I dont need to sharpen the larger pics and saving them at 75 or 80% they still come out looking pretty good (IMO). I use thumbs plus for everything by the way.

* Useful Warrior haha, good one

Ramster · 2006-08-24, 09:17 AM

Why would you need or want pics over 100K? I make galleries everyday and using photos that are 800 pixels on the long side and they are usually 60-80Kb...100K is just overkill. And every extra second it takes for a photo to load is a second more of interest the surfer loses.

BishopWeber · 2006-08-25, 12:17 AM

There is a Power Toy called "Image Resizer" very usefull to create thumbs or resize pictures with a right click on Win XP. It make pictures of 30K to 60K at 750/500 and they look good for me.
Can download at http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/d...powertoys.mspx

virgohippy · 2006-08-25, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BishopWeber

There is a Power Toy called "Image Resizer" very usefull to create thumbs or resize pictures with a right click on Win XP. It make pictures of 30K to 60K at 750/500 and they look good for me.
Can download at http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/d...powertoys.mspx

That is one nifty little gizmo! And those other tools look even more neeto too.

Thank you much for sharing.

2006-08-24, 06:11 AM	#1
AWMJ Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know? Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 15	Rule. Pics file size under 100kb. In our days when th******** high speed internet connection is a regular thing and the bandwidth is pretty cheap. Why such rule still exist? Hey Netpond be so kind remove this rule.

2006-08-24, 08:18 AM	#3
Jeremy Remember to rebel against the authorities, kids! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: AU Posts: 406	Jeka: That's about the long and the short of it. Not everyone has super-quick, high-speed broadband. Oddly, they'll wait if they're paying for it, but not if it's free. AWMJ: Learn how to use a thumbnailing program and increase your selling opportunities to every surfer. __________________ XXX Porno Hardcore

2006-08-24, 10:03 AM	#5
Useless Certified Nice Person Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dirty Undies, NY Posts: 11,268	Thanks for pulling me into a thread that I had zero intention of entering. This shit gets discussed over and over and over (and over) again. Optimize your fucking pics. This is a no whine zone. My quote post above was referring to pic size, not weight. You can produce larger pics with relatively low weight while maintaining visual clarity with simple optimization. __________________ Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.

2006-08-24, 08:15 PM	#7
WarBot If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 306	I havent had any problems keeping the pics around 80kb at 700-740 on the long side yet. But I know I have a few sets where I probably will. Mostly the outdoor stuff, the dark background with alot of colors stuff, and a few others. The new 1200 rule and the old 80kb rule did force me to figure out that I dont need to sharpen the larger pics and saving them at 75 or 80% they still come out looking pretty good (IMO). I use thumbs plus for everything by the way. * Useful Warrior haha, good one __________________ Submit Your TGP Galleries

2006-08-24, 09:17 AM	#8
Ramster Life is good Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ottawa, Canada Posts: 11,867	Why would you need or want pics over 100K? I make galleries everyday and using photos that are 800 pixels on the long side and they are usually 60-80Kb...100K is just overkill. And every extra second it takes for a photo to load is a second more of interest the surfer loses. __________________ Pornstar Legends \| Live Cam Model Shows \| Hungarian Girls Skype: robmurray999

2006-08-24, 07:20 AM	#2
Jeka My wife is not a doobie to be passed around! On our wedding day I promised to bogart her for life! Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 275	Eventhough I don't like that rule neither I can see some reasons for that rule. - There are still people using slow connections and it would take too long for them to load big images (I wonder why they should ever join a site then as the images in the member areas are a lot bigger) - By limiting the file size to 80kb they make sure that nobody gives away the original pictures (3000x2000 px) etc. which increases signup changes

2006-08-25, 12:17 AM	#9
BishopWeber They have the Internet on computers, now? Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Pocitos.Mvdo.Uy Posts: 145	There is a Power Toy called "Image Resizer" very usefull to create thumbs or resize pictures with a right click on Win XP. It make pictures of 30K to 60K at 750/500 and they look good for me. Can download at http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/d...powertoys.mspx __________________ Bishop 8-= Eugenia Diordiychuk