ccbill scrub up?

[Emperor]

Originally Posted by Toby

Hmmm, someone must have pee'd in our Cherios this morning. |pissleft|

Very professional. Is that supposed to be funny or witty ? (there is no apostrophe in peed by the way)

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

Ewww... over 10 programs. Wow! You must be a fucking genius then.

I'm smarter than you loser.

I was hoping this board was for serious webmasters.

Emperor
RW

[Jel]

Originally Posted by Emperor

I was hoping this board was for serious webmasters.

Emperor
RW

It is, so when you 'guess' that people here have a 'shitty site' which they happened upon through a CJ instead of taking the time to research and realise that the majority here own and/or submit Link List traffic and free sites then you my find that you are the one that doesn't get taken seriously.

I'd suggest backing up a touch and doing less 'guessing' and more actual asking.

Nice to meet you.

[Ramster]

Originally Posted by Emperor

Hi,

You know, it's easy to blame someone else for your failures, and to even go so far as to say you're being cheated.

My CCBill sales are 1:552 for the month (to date), and that's with a lot of sales using more than 10 programs so it's an accurate overall figure.

What type of traffic do you get to your site ? Let me guess, someone at another sites clicks a sexy thumbnail thinking he'll get a nice gallery but instead ends up at your (piece of shit) site, luckily for you he decides to click a few of your thumbs/links because he doesn't mind wasting his time (if he did mind he wouldn't be at the site that circle jerked him to your site in the first place) and after four clicks (and three closed windows) he finally gets a gallery that works. Do you really think he's going to order anything at that point ?

But I have a solution for you: build more sites just like that and keep complaining about how CCBill "scrubs", after all, that's what everyone else does.

Great Emperor
RW

Dude, I know you're not talking to me.

I was simply making conversation. I do NOT run any CJ sites. I run link lists and tgps that do NOT skim. I make clean galleries with no blind links all accepted at most of the top TGPs on the market. I also get 1000's of SE hits a day for various keywords and most of them do not involve the word "free".

I would have responded earlier but I was away all weekend.

And this is a serious webmaster board but your post isn't very friendly. If you saw my traffic and it was from a blind thumb tgp then you'd have the right to post what you did and I'd agree 100%. But that's not my traffic so...

[natalie]

Nice way to introduce yourself LOSER! I think you thought you were posting on a board like GFY. How about next time you come to a new board you take the time to find out what sort of business the people there do.

[Linkster]

Gotta go along with the fact that your tone (Emperor) was way off base - the numbers I posted I believe I qualified as SE traffic - that means they are coming from the #1 results for terms like footjobs, voyeur sex, ebony sex etc on Google - and have converted in the past way better than the conversions you are showing for CCBill - what was interesting is that all of a sudden those same filtered surfers (with my own filtering) are now buying from the same sponsor, same ads, exact same traffic at rates not even 1/10th of former sales - so either Ive done something wrong (which is very possible but I have a feeling its not in this case) or a sponsor or two is doing something wrong.
Which brings me to my last post on this subject - I am organizing a project right now that will test all the sponsors (including those of this board that are involved in this) with what I think is a worthwhile investment of my own capital to find out exactly what time of day the sponsors are turning on and off sales, which days they are switching them and exactly which sponsors are not being entirely up to snuff - this will involve some highly sophisticated tracking that they cant detect as well as test signups that cannot be traced to WMs (although we will follow their TOS to let them know afterwards) and then the results will be published here with no political influence (Im a little too old for that shit) and with no association whatsoever with the publishers of this or any other board - I want this to be a totally unbiased study therefore I also wont allow anyone associated with any sponsor in any way to be involved.

[natalie]

way to go Linkster! I can't wait to see the results.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Emperor

I'm smarter than you loser.

Emperor
RW

I must confess, I am a loser. That's why I don't gamble. I have horrible luck. I will, however, play strip poker. But that's only because I like to get naked in front of strangers when I'm drinking. I sometimes play strip solitaire in bus stations for that very reason.

I'll have to take you on your word on the other point, being as you have yet to prove your intelligence.

[natalie]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

I'll have to take you on your word on the other point, being as you have yet to prove your intelligence.

Well actually UW I think he has proved his lack of it.

[Mr. Blue]

Wonder why guys named Emperor always stir shit on boards. Unless this is the same Emperor that posts on another board I frequent. The arrogant tone sounds the same...I'll have to get ronnie (Also known as the little helper / little dictator) to verify this fact for me.

[Jel]

Looking forward to those findings Linkster

[Lenny]

Damn Emperor, you're a real dick.

It doesn't matter what kind of traffic people have or how they send it, they're comparing ratios from one period to the next....apples to apples.

Now go take a long walk off a short cliff