hacked?

[Cleo]

That don't look good

"The question is, at the very least, controversy. We know that simplest
it is to condemn hacker sumariamente that it invades a site or
computer. But until point it is the guilty unico? E the Webmasters?
Which the parcel of guilt of them? Many defend, also, that quick
hacker a job to the community when it invades a page and it shows how
much the this is vulnerable and how much he is dangerous to deposit
confidence in yielding confidential information to these sites. But it
is not total for there. If we only used this theory, we could for
anologia say that the outlaw whom he steals is giving to a job the
society when showing that the security system as a whole is defective.
Hacker: outlaw or young man?"