2257 regs published in full

[Toby]

Originally Posted by RawAlex

...a softcore image in a series of hardcore images could be contrued as being part of a sexuality explicit photoset.

Definitely some food for thought. Under that interpretation even if I had a 100% non-explicit adult site, I'd still need to have to a statement from the original producer of each "set" stating that it is non-explicit. That's where I begin to have constitutional issues with 2257. This quickly becomes a situation of guilty until proven innocent.

I wish the FSC success in getting the court to throw this out.