Content question: SSNs on model releases

Linkster · 2005-10-19, 09:23 PM

The correct interpretation would be that they are an independent contractor - however you need to have that in your contract to ensure the IRS cannot come back and saythey were an employee - and therefore you would not have to have a W-4 or I-9. This would also get rid of any requirement to have the SSN - however keep in mind that a lot of states use the SSN as the DL number and you would have to show that number(if they are using that as their ID) so in those states it would be a moot point.
Juggernaut - Im not sure why they would have both classifications in those contracts as you cant be both - there are two other classifications as well that I cant remember the names of - but you cant be an employee and an independent contractor for the same job.

2005-10-19, 09:23 PM	#15
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	The correct interpretation would be that they are an independent contractor - however you need to have that in your contract to ensure the IRS cannot come back and saythey were an employee - and therefore you would not have to have a W-4 or I-9. This would also get rid of any requirement to have the SSN - however keep in mind that a lot of states use the SSN as the DL number and you would have to show that number(if they are using that as their ID) so in those states it would be a moot point. Juggernaut - Im not sure why they would have both classifications in those contracts as you cant be both - there are two other classifications as well that I cant remember the names of - but you cant be an employee and an independent contractor for the same job. __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash