So, I have been thinking about this Cambria Struggles in Senate Porn Hearings

[Toby]

Originally Posted by SirMoby

Have you looked at the different levels that are already supported by browsers? You can't possibly think they're complicated.

But do they work to block adult content? No, not very well because most sites don't include any coding and get blocked by default when it's not adult at all, so people just turn it off.

Originally Posted by SirMoby

Also with only one rating then it's real easy for an ISP under pressure from the crazies to just block all adult or for new laws to be placed that require all adult to use AVS.

By breaking out different ratings then perhaps the courts can fight over extreme hardcore material without pulling simple nudity into the mix. Without different levels showing a nipple is labled the same way as bukake.

This is a reality regardless of the rating system and is an entirely different issue.

Originally Posted by SirMoby

I also think the a proposal should consider all adult material and that includes hate and violence presented by the same news agencies that want us banned.

This is a whole other can of worms. If news sites want to use a rating="violence" tag, more power to them, but that's a different political agenda. I'm only concerned with an effective way to keep kids out of porn sites.