Quote:
Originally Posted by [BV]
...His reasons were to make his check payment option less attractive and his Epass option more attractive in order to cut down on the amount of checks he writes, thus cutting down on the amount of fraud issues related to checks that he claims is an issue for his program....
|
I get that part - my point is why does everyone have to pay for the fuck-up's of others? If I lost a check, I'd have no problem paying whatever fees were required to replace it.
But to charge everyone $5 to cover the costs of potential problems that may or may not happen is not right.
Hell, the $5 for the check might actually be cheaper than ePass in the long run. You get charged $2 per ATM withdrawal. There's a fee on both ends to transfer money to & from your bank.
Fees Fees Fees.....
2007-01-09, 12:47 AM
Threaded Mode