Google's 950 Penalty

Bill · 2007-05-17, 10:54 PM

You said "it's no doubt that its a penalty".

I think it's just as likely that it's simply the way the new algos score and therefore rank a site.

I haven't seen yet a good piece of evidence that it's a flag or a penalty.

I understand you guys think it's a penalty, but I don't think you can claim that just because you are suddenly dropped in the serps, that it's caused by a penalty, when a algo change in ranking determinates is just as possible, and given what I think we know about google, more likely.

When I ask this question about networks, I'm asking, do you have some new evidence that it's networks, and not the other more publicized factors, that are causing this.

For all I know you have good evidence - I just haven't seen it, or heard anything that I think supports it, yet.

2007-05-17, 10:54 PM	#30
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	You said "it's no doubt that its a penalty". I think it's just as likely that it's simply the way the new algos score and therefore rank a site. I haven't seen yet a good piece of evidence that it's a flag or a penalty. I understand you guys think it's a penalty, but I don't think you can claim that just because you are suddenly dropped in the serps, that it's caused by a penalty, when a algo change in ranking determinates is just as possible, and given what I think we know about google, more likely. When I ask this question about networks, I'm asking, do you have some new evidence that it's networks, and not the other more publicized factors, that are causing this. For all I know you have good evidence - I just haven't seen it, or heard anything that I think supports it, yet.