|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: Is it smart to write post titles in the form of "PR4 Hardlinks Wanted"? | |||
No, because google is aware of these practices, is hunting them down, can find them easily, and can punish you and everyone you link to. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 5.26% |
No, because it tends to create unnatural linking patterns, that are probably detected by the google algo and absolutely easily detected by google investigative tools. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 68.42% |
It just don't matter. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 21.05% |
Yes, because linking based on PR can produce better serp positions. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Yes, because it's important that a page have good PR to attract good links. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 5.26% |
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#5 |
Mean people suck, nice people swallow, are you mean or nice?
|
Well I'm confused. You're only concerned with post titles? You think Google finds post titles mentioning PR link trades and punishes sites requesting link trades based on PR? What if webmasters made their link trade requests via e-mail and not in a post title?
Unnatural linking patterns? What's unnatural about a PR4 site having a link trade with a PR4 site? I haven't studied anything at all about PR but I don't see why Google would punish a site just because it requested a link trade with a site with the same PR as it's own. Since no one knows what the actual algorythm is, we can only guess. I think Google is more concerned with relevancy to search term/s. From what I've heard PR is overrated. My free sites get a LOT of traffic from link list pages that have PR0 and PR1. That's enough for me not to worry about PR. ![]() I don't know anything about all this so my questions are just to get information. Last edited by Licker4U; 2007-05-24 at 08:32 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|