Sollarbilling - Another Crook Stealing Money

[DMc]

Originally posted by RWF
Daryll, what confuses me a bit is your term "reseller".

Do you mean that a "reseller" is the paysite/webmaster who has an account with Verotel, and uses Verotel to bill his members

OR

is a "reseller" an affiliate of the above paysite?


I have never, and will never use Verotel as my billing provider, but I have been suspended twice for "only" being an affiliate of a few Verotel sites, who in a period had slow sales and a few chargebacks.

Secondly, off course I understand that you need a system to prevent dishonest account holders and even affiliates. But to punish the affiliate with a $30 fee?!? Give me a freaking break!

Off course there should be no money to the paysite owner and no comisison to the affiliate on a chargeback , but why not just simply reverse the comission of that sales?

Give me just one justifiable reason why you punish affiliates of your paysites a $30 fee on a chargeback?

Like I said not only will I never, ever use Verotel for my 21 paysites, nor will I again become an affiliate of a paysite that use Verotel.

How about some comments from current paysite owners. Do you think is fair that a billing company charges your affiliates a hefty $30 fee if one of your members do a chargeback?

Or what about comments from other adult webmaster who sign up as affiliates of paysites. Do you think there $30 fee is fair?

First of all the term "reseller" refers to affiliates or revsharers NOT the paysite, sponsor or merchant.

Secondly, and for the 3rd time I might add, WE HAVE NEVER CHARGED AN AFFILIATE, RESELLER, REVSHARER A CHARGEBACK FEE!

Thirdly, why solicit comments from other webmasters whether they think it's fair when I've already stated, WE NEVER DID THAT.

Lastly, I apologize for my overzealous use of CAPS but it just seems that I keep repeating the same thing and each time it gets twisted.