 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-18, 08:30 AM
|
#18 |
|
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
GG is right. No need to worry until we know what was signed. We all want to make sure that the models are of legal age and I'm fine with that. The last proposal wasn't about protecting minors from such things though. It was more about deciding what people could see and what they could not see by providing unrealistic regulations.
Let's wait until the actual documents can be read. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode