2257 regs published in full

SirMoby · 2005-05-24, 12:40 PM

RawAlex,

If the primary producer shot 101 photos and sells me 100 non-sexually explicit photos I have no way of knowing about photo # 101 and certainly have no way of knowing if it's explicit or not.

All I have is what the producer sent me. I'm not publishing or reproducing anything explicit even though that set could be sold to someone else as explicit.

I think the thumbnail TGPs might be in the same boat. If they crop explicit images to make thumbs then they would be required to keep records. If someone else submits a non-sexually explicit thumb then the TGP owner is not reproducing something explicit.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2005-05-24, 12:40 PM	#11
SirMoby Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer. Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 2,706	RawAlex, If the primary producer shot 101 photos and sells me 100 non-sexually explicit photos I have no way of knowing about photo # 101 and certainly have no way of knowing if it's explicit or not. All I have is what the producer sent me. I'm not publishing or reproducing anything explicit even though that set could be sold to someone else as explicit. I think the thumbnail TGPs might be in the same boat. If they crop explicit images to make thumbs then they would be required to keep records. If someone else submits a non-sexually explicit thumb then the TGP owner is not reproducing something explicit.