2257 regs published in full

RawAlex · 2005-05-26, 11:36 AM

damnq, I agree with you - except for one little thing:

Company "a" with the accounting & collection office in the US is collecting for what? Porn site access? They are the commercial part of selling those websites. They are entered into a commercial agreement or conspiracy (I love that word in a ruling) to sell porn. While I am not real sure on this, it makes them part of the commericization and as a result, they may have to have records.

You need to watch this law closely, it is written backwards - it state exception rather than who is included. Unless you specifically find an exclusion that coveres you 100%, then you are included.

I don't disagree with you, but I think it is much closer to the edge than you think.

Alex

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2005-05-26, 11:36 AM	#11
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	damnq, I agree with you - except for one little thing: Company "a" with the accounting & collection office in the US is collecting for what? Porn site access? They are the commercial part of selling those websites. They are entered into a commercial agreement or conspiracy (I love that word in a ruling) to sell porn. While I am not real sure on this, it makes them part of the commericization and as a result, they may have to have records. You need to watch this law closely, it is written backwards - it state exception rather than who is included. Unless you specifically find an exclusion that coveres you 100%, then you are included. I don't disagree with you, but I think it is much closer to the edge than you think. Alex