2257 regs published in full

abe · 2005-05-27, 03:22 PM

I'm not sure if my idea about their crosslinking is right.
I understand this. For instance you have a set of 100 pics completely documented and filed.
Out of that set you make 2 gals of lets say 15 pîcs.
Each gal has a url. I think that now for each pic you have used in the gals, you have to update the original file of the set giving for each pic the url where you have used it.
If you have used eg pic245 on both galleries, then you will find 2 url's for that pic in the original set documentation.
And in the documentation of the gallery you will find a reference to the original set/picture.

If it is something like this, then I think that it is not to difficult to make something in MS Access to keep track of all this. Might be easier then Excel.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2005-05-27, 03:22 PM	#11
abe Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand! Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Belgium Posts: 99	I'm not sure if my idea about their crosslinking is right. I understand this. For instance you have a set of 100 pics completely documented and filed. Out of that set you make 2 gals of lets say 15 pîcs. Each gal has a url. I think that now for each pic you have used in the gals, you have to update the original file of the set giving for each pic the url where you have used it. If you have used eg pic245 on both galleries, then you will find 2 url's for that pic in the original set documentation. And in the documentation of the gallery you will find a reference to the original set/picture. If it is something like this, then I think that it is not to difficult to make something in MS Access to keep track of all this. Might be easier then Excel.