2257 regs published in full

RawAlex · 2005-06-03, 01:09 AM

Alphawolf: It would appear that, providing the primary producer is outside the US, then government issued IDs in that country would be acceptable. That is what I read anyway, but that isn't a section I spent too much time on yet. I think they are trying to stop the "underground" porn movie trade, of bringing in models without valid work cards, having them shoot 10 - 20 movies in a month, and then go back to their country with what for them is a pile of cash - all without paying a cent of tax in the US.

It is things like this that reveal the true intentions of this sort of "rule" adjustment - they are attempting to use "law A" to fix "problem B".

Alex

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2005-06-03, 01:09 AM	#18
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	Alphawolf: It would appear that, providing the primary producer is outside the US, then government issued IDs in that country would be acceptable. That is what I read anyway, but that isn't a section I spent too much time on yet. I think they are trying to stop the "underground" porn movie trade, of bringing in models without valid work cards, having them shoot 10 - 20 movies in a month, and then go back to their country with what for them is a pile of cash - all without paying a cent of tax in the US. It is things like this that reveal the true intentions of this sort of "rule" adjustment - they are attempting to use "law A" to fix "problem B". Alex