Greenguy's Board WebcamWiz CRAZY $5,000 Reward Bonuses


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > Products and/or Services Offered
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2005-06-10, 11:09 PM   #1
xxxjay
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
xxxjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: atlanta
Posts: 1,787
Send a message via ICQ to xxxjay Send a message via AIM to xxxjay
OCCash 2257 Announcement

OCCash 2257 Announcement (controversial)

OK, it is time the big OCCash 2257 announcement. This is very likely to be the most controversial one yet. There are more underlying factors to this decision that I am allowed to discuss at this time, but fear not – things will play out in the coming weeks.

Rather than waste your time with my rambling, I would like to provide you with a letter from our attorney, which we have been given permission to post.

Email me jay@occash.com if you have questions, comments, or problems.


THE LAW OFFICE OF
JEFFREY J. DOUGLAS
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

TELEPHONE 1717 FOURTH STREET, THIRD FLOOR TELECOPIER
(310) 576-3411 SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401-3319 (310) 576-3408

June 10, 2005


Re: Secondary Producer Records Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2257

To Whom It May Concern:

I represent OC Cash Media. We received your inquiry concerning copies of records for secondary producers. I am very familiar with 18 U.S.C. § 2257 in my capacities as a First Amendment and criminal defense practitioner, the Chairman Emeritus of the First Amendment Lawyers Association and the Chair of the Board of the industry’s trade association, the Free Speech Coalition. I write this letter exclusively in my capacity as OC Cash Media’s attorney

Despite General Gonzalez’ efforts at reviving the concept of “secondary producers” in the most recent version of regulations in support of 18 U.S.C. § 2257, the concept is not supported by the statute itself. The only case addressing the issue, Sundance Assocs. Inc. v. Reno, 139 F.3d 804, 807 (10th Cir.1998), held that the “secondary producer” requirements of the regulations to be unconstitutional. We rely on that holding, and further decline to violate the privacy of the performing artists by disseminating private data when not required to do so by law.

If you have any questions regarding this policy, please do not hesitate to call, or have your attorney do so.


Sincerely,

The Law Office of
Jeffrey J. Douglas

By: Jeffrey J. Douglas


cc: OC Cash Media
__________________
Circle Of Violence
xxxjay is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 AM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc