Pulling Free Sites Because Of 2257? Post The Info Here

[natalie]

I have been removing only ones where the sponsors might close my account if I don't and they werent earning much.
Because I havent put compliance notices everywhere yet and are in a rush I may one of those Dave is talking about, I will check soon. I am removing sites so they go 404 but havent checked all my 404 pages.

[Pusher]

I am removing ALL my free sites for the following domains...

adult-sex-sites.net
free-sex-pix.net
free-sex-pics-galleries.net
free-pornpics.net
porn-freepics.com
free-world-sex.net
hot-teen-sex.us

If there is a TRO or injunction, I plan on uploading them again...

My main LL's will still be up - minus images until things blow over or I can replace them with softcore ones...

[Linkster]

I have just put all of my sites back online

And Airdick isnt just redirecting to that one site - all of his sites are redirecting to different sponsors sites - but then so are a half dozen other WMs that are regulars around here

[plateman]

Ok I said I wasnt BL and when I read his post he said he was removing and I know it's crazy right now..

[airdick]

Originally Posted by Linkster

I have just put all of my sites back online

And Airdick isnt just redirecting to that one site - all of his sites are redirecting to different sponsors sites - but then so are a half dozen other WMs that are regulars around here

I guess if some of you guys that listed my stuff really have a problem with the 302s I can change to a generic 404 page or something instead of using niche-specific 302s. Maybe I can come up with some rules to cream off the search engine traffic first and let the rest of it 404.

[Linkster]

Actually doesnt really matter in the big scheme of things - which is why Im putting everything back online Just because you take it down doesnt keep you from getting inspected - you still have to have the records for 5 years after you take it down so its kinda stupid to go through the motions now

[Useless]

The very best way to pull everything is to have a 404 page that explains why the pages were pulled. I've seen some nice ones today. Just a quick statement about how much GW sucks and below it a sponsor ad. No redirection.

One should only redirect if they have no qualms with being banned. No matter the situation, it's still pretty shady because the surfers aren't getting what was promised. Surfers don't blame the unknown redirecting webmaster. They blame link lists and TGPs for not having clean listings.

[airdick]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

The very best way to pull everything is to have a 404 page that explains why the pages were pulled. I've seen some nice ones today. Just a quick statement about how much GW sucks and below it a sponsor ad. No redirection.

One should only redirect if they have no qualms with being banned. No matter the situation, it's still pretty shady because the surfers aren't getting what was promised. Surfers don't blame the unknown redirecting webmaster. They blame link lists and TGPs for not having clean listings.

I thought you guys with the big linklists and big tgps ran link checker scripts every few hours and deleted all sites that have gone 404 or return 302 redirects.

[f69j69b]

Originally Posted by Linkster

Actually doesnt really matter in the big scheme of things - which is why Im putting everything back online Just because you take it down doesnt keep you from getting inspected - you still have to have the records for 5 years after you take it down so its kinda stupid to go through the motions now

why would you have to have records if you had no sites up when the new regs start being used wouldnt you only need what was required by the old regs not records at your place of business.

Fred