1st amendment arguments in the US have reached the level of, well, stupid. It has come down to a series of bizarre absolutes (everything must be free or nothing is free).
What you guys tend to forget is that looking at this whole situation, the girl was running a commercial dungeon in a residential neighborhood. I am sorry, but freedom or not, I won't want a whiphouse next door to mine. I don't want my children exposed to it, and I don't think that an commercial (receiving clinets) adult business should operate in a residential neighborhood.
Does the 1st amendment give her the right to lower the living standards of her neighborhood? Does it give her the right potentially expose her chosen lifestyle to children around that area? To bring people into the neighborhood that might find children tasty? Think hard.
More over, I think it is sad to have her come here and cry for support. It doesn't have anything to do with her online activities (otherwise her website would likely be toasted as well). It isn't our fight.
|